Imperial Party forum

thomas davison

Cancer sufferer refused treatment by the NHS attacks David Cameron, forcing him to defend his �12billion foreign aid bill�The treatment she needs to beat non-Hodgkin lymphoma is available in Europe but not in her area, she said

�The 68-year-old used the name Anna because some members of her family don't even know she's ill
�She accused the PM of sending money abroad that should be staying in Britain
�'We have a moral obligation to help people in other countries even when times are tough,' he replied in tense LBC interview

By Martin Robinson
PUBLISHED: 11:41, 8 August 2012 | UPDATED: 14:21, 8 August 2012

..
Uncomfortable: David Cameron, pictured, was questioned on live radio by a cancer-sufferer who asked him to justify why so much money was going on foreign aid
David Cameron was today forced to defend sending �12 billion abroad in foreign aid when confronted by a woman who may die because the NHS will not fund the cancer treatment she desperately needs.
The Prime Minister was taken to task during a live radio interview this morning where he denied Britain was wrong to have increased funding to other states by 37 per cent despite huge cuts to home budgets.
A non-Hodgkin lymphoma sufferer, who used the name Anna because some of her family do not know she is ill, asked him why taxpayers' money was going to other countries and not to people like her.
The 68-year-old from north London has stopped cancer treatment because of a dangerous allergic reaction, and the drug she needs is available in Germany but not in her area.

Tragically she is also a full-time carer for her husband, but is so ill he has been forced to go into a care home and she is living alone at home on only �68 per week.

The Prime Minister told LBC listeners he would look at her case but the UK has a 'moral obligation to help people in other countries even when times are tough,' he said. HOW ABOUT AN OBLIGATION TO PEOPLE HERE!!!

'Breaking promises to the poorest people in the world would not be the right thing to do,' he added, saying without the aid more foreigners would seek asylum in Britain. THEY ARE ALREADY HERE AND ARE LIVING IN A FREE HOUSE AND HAVE ALL THE BENEFITS ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT GET.
More...�Army wife faces losing her eyesight as NHS chiefs refuse to pay for injections in postcode lottery
�Profits before patients: Care home residents subjected to horrific abuse went to A&E 76 times in three years - but private owner did nothing

Speaking to MailOnline Anna said Mr Cameron should be making sure people in Britain are well looked after first.
'I understand what he is saying, but I would say to him if your family is starving you wouldn't go and feed your neighbours. He should be looking after people here.
HE IS ONLY LOOKING AFTER NUMBER ONE, THE REST OF US CAN GO TO HELL.

Tearful: A distraught Anna, not her real name, has stopped non hodgkin lymphoma treatment, shown being given to this woman at London's Royal Marsden Hospital
'I have offered to pay my own airfare to Germany to get this treatment, but every day I wake up waiting for news of whether a charity can raise the �250,000 I need to pay for it. I know I may be one of many people in this situation and I don't think that is right.

'We put all this money into Europe but we are unable to go there and get something for it.
NO YOU ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO PAY TO KEEP THEM GOING UNTIL YOU DIE.

'My husband has gone into a care home because I cannot care for him myself. I am just consumed with grief.

SOME OF ENGLAND'S POST-CODE LOTTERIES
CANCER

Patients with suspected cancer in parts of England are 60 times more likely to be sent for scans than those living elsewhere, according to a study by the National Cancer Intelligence Network in July.

While a GP practice in Sefton, Merseyside, referred 5,591 per 100,000, another in Hillingdon, London, referred only 89 per 100,000.

DIABETES

Only six per cent of sufferers received the recommended levels of care in some areas compared to 69 per cent in the highest-achieving primary care trusts (PCTs), a National Audit Office (NAO) report found in May.

The worst offenders were Mid Essex and Swindon PCTs.

ARTHRITIS

There is almost a three-fold variation in the amount of money primary care trusts across England spend on arthritis services, a study revealed in April.

NHS Hartlepool spent �764 per patient in 2009-10, but NHS Peterborough only �275, according to the Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Alliance.

EYE SIGHT

Dawn Thomas, 44, says South Staffordshire Primary Care Trust (PCT) has denied her medication that would save her sight despite it being available on the NHS in other parts of the country.

The army wife and mother-of-one needs several injections of Lucentis or Aventis, which cost �800 a time. They have been found to be effective in treating people with her genetic condition known as PXE. She is now looking to sell her house if her appeal fails.

.'All I want is to get my husband back,' she said tearfully, 'My life has stopped completely and I haven't even told my whole family that I am ill. My grandchildren are frightened of my wig and I just want them back here too.'
The Prime Minister said that the Coalition had increased spending on the NHS.
'It is very important that people get treatment,' he told LBC, 'We have not cut spending to the NHS we have increased it.
ITS SO IMPORTANT PEOPLE ARE DYING OF THIRST IN OUR HOSPITALS

'We have the cancer drugs fund and we are looking to extend that.
'We are having a tough time at the moment but we must keep promises to the poorest countries in the world.' YOU COULDNT KEEP A PROMISE IF YOU TRIED, YOUR A BIGGER LIAR THAN YOUR HERO BLAIR.
Mr Cameron is under huge pressure to freeze or even cut Britain's foreign aid spending.
India is still receiving nearly �300 million from British taxpayers in aid, for example, despite the country being rich enough to launch its own space programme.
Their own ministers even described the sum they received as 'peanuts'.
GIVE THE 300 MILLION TO OUR OLD PEOPLE INSTEAD.
A powerful committee of peers attacked the Prime Minister�s pledge to increase aid spending by 37 per cent to more than �12billion a year in order to meet an �arbitrary� United Nations target
THE UNITED NATIONS LIVE HERE AND WE ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THEM.

They said they fully supported humanitarian aid for disaster zones. But they pointed out that it accounts for less than 10 per cent of the vast budget of the Department for International Development (DfID).

In a devastating verdict they warned that the rush to increase spending �risks reducing the quality, value for money and accountability� of the aid programme.

The finding is a major embarrassment for Mr Cameron who is said, while in opposition, to have adopted the target of spending 0.7 per cent of Britain�s income on aid, partly to help �detoxify� the Conservatives� image as �the Nasty Party�. THEY ARE THE REAL NASTY PARTY GETTING ORDINARY PEOPLE TO PAY THE DEBTS THE BANKS INCURRED WHILE STILL GETTING HUGE BONUSES

The cross-party economic affairs committee said ministers seemed more interested in the amount of money they were spending on aid than the results they were achieving.

The committee�s chairman, former Tory Cabinet minister Lord MacGregor, said: 'We were unanimous in our view that legislation for a 0.7 per cent target is inappropriate, and that the Government should reconsider.

'We believe aid should be judged by the criteria of effectiveness and value for money, not by whether a specific arbitrary target is reached.'

This government still fails to listen to the people,and that is why people are dying every day,for lack of treatments in the NHS,because they do not have the money...... or english speaking staff and yet Cameron continues to give our taxpayers money to other countries that do not need it.
Would you give away your children's bread to a stranger whilst they starved? CAMERLOON WOULD GIVE YOUR BREAD AWAY BUT NOT HIS,
CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME NOT IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.
And as for Camerloon saying if we do not give them money they will come here----------well most of them are here already, not much more room inside for the others then.
What we need is a revolution to get rid of these muppets once and for all, clear out those who should not be here, get rid of the human rights laws, out of the EU, shut down the private banks and open a British bank. Build up our manufacturing base again and start trading with the other 6 billion people in the world never mind the EU.
This should be done to give the real British people a chance to get work and reduce their debts, we could do this by :-A, putting all the peoples debt in a government bank account and allow the people to pay it off over their life time, this way people would in effect be debt free and the country can start again.

B: Give every unemployed person a job, difficult NO, get rid of the foreigners from the EU and other countries that will free up 2 million jobs, which will get the people off the dole and out of their beds to go to work. With a proper British Bank interest on loans would be low and all profits would go back to the people, businesses would not have a problem borrowing money to invest unlike today.
C: Build up our armed forces, build new equipment needed for them, build ships for trading with the world again, teach real needed skills from the age of 14 in our schools to give the young a future. Go back to teaching needed subjects with properly skilled teachers including what is right and wrong, give the young pride in our country, we were the best and can be again if we get rid of the muppets.