Joined: 03 Jun 2005
|Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 12:48 pm Post subject: ROCKERFELLER CONTROLLED WORLD
|Nurse Kate Shemirani Talks About Masks, Vaccines & Health (Rockefeller controlled, link, link).
3m30s ‘I had to unlearn everything that I had learned and I learned that the whole healthcare system is actually a lie, it’s a fraud. It was there to get you sick, to keep you sick and you’re going to pay for the joy going along the way until you had no more money extracted out of you, at which point you’d pay to die and you’d pay to be disposed of. I realised that the entire allopathic medicine system was actually all taken over by a man called J. D. Rockefeller, he got rid of every other for of healing until he controlled everything’.
The Hydroxychloroquine Scandal (research misconduct, link).
‘When the world is presented with a virus which is claimed to cause a potentially fatal disease for which there is no known treatment, and if our only claimed wish is to “save life,” trialling any and all potential treatments makes obvious sense’.
‘Resistance to trials would suggest that saving life may not be the priority. If the evidence shows that powerful public health bodies and foundations have apparently colluded to stop trials, there can be little doubt another agenda has taken precedence over saving lives’.
‘When the WHO declared a global pandemic, chloroquine, and the modern form hydroxychloroquine, were the most obvious candidates for investigative clinical trials. Its possible effectiveness had, after all, been noted since at least 2005’.
‘Scientists and doctors around the world took note of early promising clinical trials in China. In France, Professor Didier Raoult, one of the worlds most published microbiologists, announced his own trials. He stated that he thought it would be foolish not to trial chloroquine more widely’.
‘Scientists at Stanford University agreed, reporting apparent treatment success in both China and South Korea. The Stanford team also advocated more thorough clinical trials of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine’.
‘Yet resistance to trialling hydroxychloroquine was immediately evident. Raoult was attacked in France for suggesting hydroxychloroquine could work to prevent the most severe, life threatening, symptoms of COVID-19. These attacks, which we would characterise as a disinformation campaign, came from the mainstream media, other scientists who worked for Inserm, and politicians’.
‘The persistent claim, repeated ad nauseam by the mainstream media, that hydroxychloroquine presents some sort of severe heart risk, simply isn’t true’.
‘The cardiovascular risks for hydroxychloroquine are overwhelmingly associated with acute poisoning, often intentional, when used in combination with other antiviral drugs, or with prolonged high dosage use’.
‘There is virtually no cardiovascular risk at all to taking it, as recommended, for short course treatments. As you would if you took it as a prophylaxis for COVID-19’.
‘The Case Fatality Rate for the oldest COVID-19 patients has been reported to rise to more than 14%. Raoult’s largest field study, of more than one thousand patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, showed that the CFR for the oldest patients dropped to 0.5%’.
‘Scientists around the world immediately noticed significant problems with the Surgisphere data. The data was too homogeneous for a global study, it seemed impossible that four researchers could collate such a massive hoard of data. Claims this had all been achieved in a matter of weeks were laughed at by many genuine scientific researchers’.
‘Surgisphere claimed they had a global network of participating hospitals, requiring global ethics and data protection approval from every individual hospital. These claims were widely considered literally unbelievable’.
‘Medical researchers and scientists from around the world wrote an open letter to the Lancet expressing their deep concerns about the study. The Lancet initially offered a minor correction attempting, but failing, to account for the erroneous data’.
‘Consequently the Lancet issued a statement saying “serious scientific concerns” had been brought to their attention. When the Lancet requested that Surgisphere participate in a data audit it seems Dr. Desai declined. At this point the other three authors of the study requested that the Lancet withdraw the paper, which it did on 3 June. Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, said:’
‘This is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency.
Yet, despite the fact that scientists from across the globe were able to spot the fake paper with ease, neither the Lancet, nor the world’s leading experts in public health, the World Health Organisation, could. Instead they suspended trials of a potentially life saving medication, that had only just begun, in the middle of a supposed global pandemic’.
Lock Step: How the Rockefeller Foundation wants to implement its autocratic pandemic scenario (link).
‘Ten years ago, the rich and powerful Rockefeller Foundation played through and favorably described a scenario in which a pandemic would lead to autocratic forms of government with total surveillance and control of citizens. Now it has published a pandemic plan to make this scenario a reality’.
‘According to the preamble by the President of the Foundation, it took two weeks to set up and edit this plan, implicating a large number of “experts and decision-makers from academia, business, politics and government – across industries and political ideologies” and publish it in glossy on April 21, 2020, under the title “National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan: Pragmatic steps to reopen our workplaces and our communities”’.
‘I became aware of this plan through a German translation of an article by Dux Morales in the Italian newspaper il manifesto about it. As I read through this my breath stood still’.
‘Two weeks seems a very short time for such a comprehensive work with allegedly many contributors and about 25 signers. However, the Foundation had ten years to prepare for this moment. So it wasn’t a hollow phrase in the 2010 publication, which already included the “Lock-Step” pandemic response scenario’.
‘As a conclusion, let me quote the (translated) conclusion from il manifesto, to which there is nothing to add:’
‘In short, this is the plan that the Rockefeller Foundation wants to implement in the United States and beyond. If it were to be implemented even partially, it would lead to a further concentration of economic and political power in the hands of even smaller elites, to the detriment of a growing majority that would be deprived of basic democratic rights. This operation is being carried out in the name of “control of Covid-19”, whose mortality rate, according to official figures, is so far less than 0.03% of the US population. The Rockefeller Foundation Plan uses the virus as a real weapon, more dangerous than Covid-19 itself’.