Joined: 03 Jun 2005
|Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:40 pm Post subject: UN PLOT TO REPLACE EUROPEANS USING REFUGEES
|U.N. plot to replace Europeans using ‘refugee crisis’!
July 24, 2017
SHARE:Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter
A recently resurfaced document drafted by the United Nations 17 years ago reveals that the global agency has been promoting “replacement migration” in Europe for many years and has been using the so-called “refugee crisis” to bring millions of African and Middle Eastern Islamic migrants into Europe over the past few years.
The plot rediscovered by WND details how open borders, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and progressive politicians have contributed to the implementation of “replacement migration” for some time, as the U.N. plan argues that mass immigration is the solution to Europe’s plunging birthrates.
“The 17-year-old document contended that mass immigration was necessary to replace the aging populations of developed countries,” WND reported. “Without the migration of populations from the developing world, it reasons, economies will suffer because of labor shortages and falling tax revenues.”
The U.N. insisted in the report that repopulating Europe with millions from other continents would properly address the so-called “problem.”
“United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe, as well as Japan, will face population decline and population aging,” the U.N. document titled “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Aging Populations?” argues. “Therefore, among the demographic variables, only international migration could be instrumental in addressing population decline and population aging in the short- to medium-term. The new challenges of declining and aging populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programs – including those relating to international migration.”
The U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs’ document detailing its “expert group meeting” – attended by numerous government agencies, NGOs and leaders from around the world in 2000 – targets certain nations and regions of the world for population redistribution.
“The meeting will focus on the eight countries considered in that report, namely France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, and the United States, and on the two regions, Europe and the European Union,” the document titled “Policy Responses to Population Aging and Population Decline” reads. “These countries and regions are experiencing rapid population aging and – with exception of the U.S. – will likely register declines in their labor force and total population.”
Groups and individuals promoting population control through abortion, sterilization and contraception had a major presence at the meeting.
“Attendees included the International Organization for Migration – a U.N. group that recently declared that mass migration is not only ‘inevitable’ but ‘necessary’ – the U.N. Population Fund (a group dedicated to ‘family planning’ and the spread of contraceptives) and; the U.S. Census Bureau,” Unruh noted.
The U.N. report insists that only millions of migrants swarming on Europe from abroad can keep the continent from economic collapse.
“The levels of migration needed to prevent population aging are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline,” the document contends. “Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.”
Not so fast …
Even though the predominating argument at the U.N. meeting insisted that mass immigration will solve the so-called “aging” problem, two American experts at the gathering tended to disagree – University of California sociologist Judith Treas and former Sloan Foundation Vice President Michael Teitelbaum. Each contended that a large migration increase would have no benefit for the U.S., with Treas pointing out that one-in-five new Americans is the product of immigration.
“Immigrants will not prevent the long-run aging of the population, except in the highly unlikely scenario of a 10-fold increase in annual immigration levels,” Treas noted, according to WND.
Former White House Adviser Patrick Buchanan – a veteran political commentator – warns that the U.N. is trying to supplant Western society as we know it.
“[The U.N.] signed on to a mass migration of Third World peoples to Europe and America – to replace the native populations – is consistent with its anti-Western ideology and comes as no surprise,” Buchanan told WND. “Not long after its birth, the U.N. came to be dominated by delegates, diplomats and staff among whose operative principles was that the West was guilty of historic crimes against humanity, and that justice demanded the endless transfer of the West’s illicitly acquired wealth to a Third World it had oppressed.”
Buchanan – who served as a senior adviser to U.S. Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan and a former presidential candidate – warned that U.N.’s history of showing contempt for the West should not be discounted.
“Resentment, envy and hatred of the West among intellectual circles at Turtle Bay (the U.N.) – often echoed within the West itself – needs to be resisted like a disease … if the West is to remain the Great Civilization it has been,” the political expert on global relations continued.
A similar sentiment about the U.N.’s anti-West design was voiced by former U.N. Ambassador Alan Keyes.
“[The] replacement migration [plot is] a decisive existential threat,” Keyes impressed to WND. “Given our form of government, careless immigration policies actually exacerbate an attack on the sovereign body of the people, whom the U.S. Constitution vests with ultimate human authority over the government it establishes, and the constitutional terms on which it is established.”
Former Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) also issued a warning as a keynote speaker at a recent gubernatorial forum in her state, alerting those attending of the vital threat to Western civilization that migration from Islamic nations poses.
“This is something that we have to be cognizant of, and not be afraid of it,” Bachmann proclaimed Wednesday, according to the St. Paul Pioneer Press. “That’s what I see in Minnesota: too many people who are being afraid of being called racists, bigots, Islamophobes – I’m not afraid of it, because what we’ve got to do is talk about the truth of the problems that are going on in Minnesota.”
In direct opposition to the U.N.’s 17-year-old plan to boost immigration to Western nations, the conservative politician laid down a solution of her own to fight the problems that increased migration from African and Middle Eastern Islamic nations have produced during the years of the Obama administration … and now into the Trump administration.
“[America should] step up deportation in the country of people who are unwilling to bear allegiance to the United States, [stop immigration from Muslim countries and prevent the creation of] parallel societies within our society,” Bachman proclaimed.
President Donald Trump also recently addressed the Islamic refugee problem during his speech in Warsaw’s Krasinski Square earlier this month.
“The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive – do we have the confidence in our values to defend them at any cost?” Trump posed to the crowd. “Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilization in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it? We can have the largest economies and the most lethal weapons anywhere on Earth, but if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive.”
Europe Migrants Population Replacement.
ALSO CALLED THE COUDENHOVE KALERGI PLAN WHICH IS WELL UNDERWAY --------------TIME TO CHANGE OUR GOVERNMENT