Imperial Party forum Forum Index Imperial Party forum
Looking from a great past towards a great future!
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Post new topic   Reply to topic    Imperial Party forum Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
thomas davison
Party Leader

Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 3858
Location: northumberland

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:20 am    Post subject: PROVEN MOBILE PHONE USE =CANCER,DEMENTIA, DEPRESSION ANXIETY Reply with quote

Government-funded studies PROVE that cellphone radiation has carcinogenic potential
Wednesday, February 06, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.

Image: Government-funded studies PROVE that cellphone radiation has carcinogenic potential

(Natural News) What have you been giving up to avoid cancer? Most people who are hoping to reduce their odds of developing this devastating illness wouldnít dream of smoking a cigarette, for example, yet few think twice about having their cellphone either glued to their hand or tucked in their pocket all day. Unfortunately, this could prove to be a deadly oversight as more evidence emerges of the carcinogenic potential of cellphone radiation.

In 2011, the World Health Organizationís International Agency for Research on Cancer classified cellphones as a ďpossible carcinogenĒ with little fanfare. Of course, well-funded smartphone manufacturers made sure this story didnít get the attention it deserved. The classification was made by the group, who is considered the gold standard when it comes to toxin classifications, based on evidence that shows electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation from the phones can spur tumors and abnormal cell growth.

Now, they may give it an even more serious categorization as the findings of a pair of government-funded studies show that cellphone radiation is far worse than originally believed.

The preliminary findings of the studies, which were carried out by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciencesí National Toxicology Program (NTP), were concerning, but the peer review of those findings significantly upgraded the risk.

The NTP uses four categories to rank the evidence of harm, ranging from most dangerous to least: clear evidence, some evidence, equivocal evidence, and no evidence. The study found clear evidence that male rats suffered from heart tumors upon exposure that were similar to tumors that have already been linked to cellphone use in the past.

The power of the elements: Discover Colloidal Silver Mouthwash with quality, natural ingredients like Sangre de Drago sap, black walnut hulls, menthol crystals and more. Zero artificial sweeteners, colors or alcohol. Learn more at the Health Ranger Store and help support this news site.

Moreover, there was some evidence of brain tumors in male rats, with precancerous lesion indications starting to develop just 58 weeks after exposure. There was also some evidence of adrenal gland tumors.

In addition, the studies found that female rats and their newborns who had been exposed to higher levels of radiation during pregnancy and lactation had a lower body weight. They also found liver, pancreatic and prostate tumors in rats and mice, while rats of both genders suffered damage to their DNA and heart tissue.

Some have criticized the findings because the exposure used in the studies was nine hours per day for two years, which they say is excessive, but how many people these days Ė especially younger people Ė leave their phones on very close to their bodies around the clock?

Itís important to keep in mind that we are also exposed to other sources of radiofrequency EMFs in our daily lives, and the effects are cumulative. With computers, cordless phones, smart meters, smart appliances, baby monitors, and tablets with Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, the odds are very much stacked against many of us.

Study results didnít get much publicity
Interestingly, reporters did not get very much notice of the NTPís teleconference on the reportís release, with many editors simply not having enough time to assign reporters to cover the story. This was awfully convenient for smartphone makers and telecommunication firms. Just one reporter, The New York Timesí William Broad, was given a heads up. Broad and his paper are known for downplaying electromagnetic radiation dangers, and his piece on the report was typically soft and full of qualifiers.

The New York Times piece also plays down the results by saying they used 2G technology, which is not used as much as 3G and 4G these days. However, the truth is that German studies have shown that 3G signals enhance tumor growth, and experts have expressed serious reservations about the effects that up-and-coming 5G technology will have on human health given the fact that itís much stronger.

In addition to raising your cancer risk, cellphone radiation has been shown to contribute to dementia, depression, and anxiety, so itís no wonder weíre seeing more of these illnesses lately. We are only just beginning to understand the long-term damage this type of radiation will cause.

Sources for this article include:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Imperial Party forum Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by

For Support -

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | | Image Hosting | Photo Gallery |

Powered by, setup your forum now!