Imperial Party forum

thomas davison

Growing Change: A Journey Inside Venezuela�s Food Revolution investigates our current food system and the solutions to world hunger
Contrary to popular belief, modern agriculture techniques are not a solution, but rather the very heart of the problem. Poor soil quality is a core problem facing farmers across the globe, and the Earth's soil is depleting at more than 13 percent the rate it can be replaced due to our chemical-based agriculture system

Dr. Mercola

Simon Cunich�s documentary film Growing Change: A Journey Inside Venezuela�s Food Revolution investigates our current food system as he tries to understand why hundreds of millions of people go hungry each day.

Is it true that there�s simply not enough to go around? And as the world faces an increasing number of environmental challenges, how will we feed a global population of more than seven billion people?

Can We Grow a Fair and Sustainable Food System?
The film begins by looking at the underlying causes of food shortages, such as what we saw in 2008 when food riots broke out in about 30 countries. The situation actually wasn�t bad news for everyone. Major food corporations made record-breaking profits during this difficult time.

Many believe the answer to world hunger is further expansion of large-scale agriculture; others place their bets on genetically engineered (GE) crops. But is large-scale GE farming really going to solve the problem?

Evidence suggests the answer is a resounding NO. In fact, our modern agricultural system is the very heart of the problem...

What we�re looking at is �a human-induced land management disaster,� according to Walter Jehne, Director of Healthy Soils Australia. Modern monoculture has severely depleted soils of essential nutrients and microorganisms, and poor soil quality is a core problem facing farmers across the globe, Cunich discovered.

The Earth's soil is depleting at more than 13 percent the rate it can be replaced due to our chemical-based agriculture system. Massive monoculture has also led to the extinction of 75 percent of the world's crop varieties over the last century. Additionally, modern agriculture is extremely energy dependent. According to statistics in the film, every consumer in the Western world eats the equivalent of 66 barrels of oil per year. That�s how much oil is needed to produce the food on your plate.

Playing "Chicken" with Mother Nature
In the words of Michael Pollan, author of The Omnivore's Dilemma and a number of other bestsellers: "Mother Nature destroys monocultures."

Monoculture (or monocropping) is defined as the high-yield agricultural practice of growing a single crop year after year on the same land, in the absence of rotation through other crops. Corn, soybeans, wheat, and to some degree rice, are the most common crops grown with monocropping techniques. In fact, corn, wheat and rice account for about 60 percent of human caloric intake, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Monoculture is detrimental to the environment for a number of reasons, including the following:

It damages soil ecology by depleting and reducing the diversity of soil nutrients
It creates an unbuffered niche for parasitic species to take over, making crops more vulnerable to opportunistic pathogens that can quickly wipe out an entire crop
It increases dependency on chemical pesticides and fertilizers
It increases reliance on expensive specialized farm equipment and machinery that require heavy use of fossil fuels
It destroys biodiversity
By contrast, polyculture (the traditional rotation of crops and livestock) better serves both land and people. Polyculture evolved to meet the complete nutritional needs of a local community, and when done mindfully, automatically replenishes what is taken out, making it sustainable with minimal effort.

The Venezuelan Experiment
After hearing about efforts in Venezuela to develop a more equitable and sustainable food and agriculture system, the filmmaker heads there to see if it's working and find out what we might be able to learn from this giant experiment.1

Venezuela, like so many other nations, is dependent on food imports to feed its citizens as its agricultural sector has fallen into neglect after decades of urbanization. Here, Cunich finds a movement underway to reconstruct a more equitable food system.

In lush coastal villages we meet cocoa producers who are now protected against being paid below the minimum price and are now involved in the local processing of chocolate rather than just exporting raw beans. We head out to sea with fisherfolk who are benefiting from new regulations that ban industrial trawling. In the chaotic metropolis of Caracas we find urban gardens thriving and supplementing diets with fresh organic produce. We go inside shops where the urban poor have access to affordable food.

It's all part of a country-wide process towards "food sovereignty", driven by communities and the government. At the core of the process are principles of social justice and sustainability2.

Agricultural Experts are in Agreement: Organic Farming Can Feed the World
A question often asked about organic agriculture is whether it can be productive enough to meet the world's food needs. While many agree ecological agriculture is desirable from an environmental point of view, fears remain that it will not produce sufficient yields. Time and again, however, agricultural studies have shown that such fears are unfounded.

In fact, according to a report compiled by some 400 of the world�s top scientist3, in order to feed the world, we cannot continue relying on the industrial agriculture currently in use. It is, quite simply, unsustainable. We need farming methods that rebuild our ecological systems rather than demolish them. Other studies have come to the identical conclusion. We CAN feed the world, but we must be willing to give up large-scale, chemical-based industrial agriculture in order to do so. For example, one 2008 study4 found that on average:

In developed countries, organic systems produce 92 percent of the yield produced by conventional agriculture
In developing countries, organic systems produce 80 percent more than conventional farms
Another review of 286 projects in 57 countries found that farmers who used "resource-conserving" or ecological agriculture increased their agricultural productivity by an average of 79 percent.

In light of this, when I hear someone extolling the virtues of modern agriculture and wondering how organic or ecological farming could possibly be the solution, I argue the real question is how in the world did we come to accept LESS efficient industrial practices (which includes dousing our food with chemical fertilizers and pesticides) as a viable way to grow food! That�s the real wonder...There�s more to it than just changing the way the food is grown,

Fair distribution
Fair trade
Community power and independence
Access to land, resources, markets

No matter what is said here with the world population heading up to 8 billion and more it will be impossible to feed, employ and water this huge amount of people when there are so many different religous factions involved.
It stands out a mile that over half the worlds population has to die for the rest to survive, our planet cannot be raped anymore, but how will it be done? war? famine? plague or all three?
The answer is there to see if you look hard enough.