Imperial Party forum Forum Index Imperial Party forum
Looking from a great past towards a great future!
www.imperialparty.co.uk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

HOUSEHOLDS HAVE TO SUBSIDISE POOR IN GREEN ENERGY CHANGES

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Imperial Party forum Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
thomas davison
Party Leader


Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 4018
Location: northumberland

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:15 pm    Post subject: HOUSEHOLDS HAVE TO SUBSIDISE POOR IN GREEN ENERGY CHANGES Reply with quote

Home�Earth�Energy
Households 'may have to pay up to �125' for green changes to poor homes
Households may have to pay up to �125 per year to cover the cost of �green� home improvements for the poorest customers under Coalition plans, energy companies have warned.

By Rowena Mason, Political Correspondent
7:30PM GMT 21 Nov 2012
Industry sources said the cost of a new green scheme has been underestimated by up to �1.8 billion per year by Whitehall officials.

The new policy, called the Energy Company Obligation, will begin to hit households next year at a time when rising gas prices have already pushed the average bill above �1,335 annually.

Under the initiative, gas and electricity suppliers will be forced to offer poor households ways to save energy, such as insulation and more efficient boilers, which will be charged back to all households through bills.

Ministers claim this will cost bill-payers just �1.3 billion per year or about �50 per household � the same as under current schemes to help poor customers.

However, one major energy company told The Daily Telegraph that it is preparing for the cost of ECO to be up to �3.1 billion per year � or �125 per household.

Related Articles
Ed Davey: households to get cheaper energy bills after paying too much
20 Nov 2012
Energy deal reforms 'could cost families more'
20 Nov 2012
Families could save �300 on energy under government plans
20 Nov 2012
First 'bribe' for wind farm communities
19 Nov 2012
PM promises to end 'bureaucratic nonsense' over equality
19 Nov 2012
Another senior energy boss agreed with this assessment, saying the Government �needs to switch its digits around� to from �1.3 billion to �3.1 billion.

The Government strongly disputes its scheme will be so expensive. Greg Barker, the climate change minister, said he �will certainly not allow customer bills to be impacted in that way�.

He added: "The Prime Minister showed this week with his determination to legislate to get people the lowest energy tariffs that we are the Government on the side of the consumer."

Mr Barker said energy companies will be forced to meet their obligations at the Government's price or hand over their responsibilities to third parties to deliver more cheaply.

�We believe our economic model is robust and [the companies] are not taking into account the dynamics of the market,� he told The Daily Telegraph.

Energy companies are currently lobbying the Government to put a �1.3 billion cap on the cost of ECO, amid fears that suppliers will be blamed for rising bills when the scheme comes into force.

Energy UK, the industry group representing the Big Six suppliers, has commissioned an independent report into the issue, which will be presented to the Prime Minister and Ed Davey, the Energy Secretary, today.

This study by NERA Economic Consulting found the cost of the green charges will be around �2.3 billion � or �95 per household.

But it says this estimate may be too low as there are other risks to the green scheme that could cause the real cost to �exceed� this figure.

The report, due to be published on Monday, will say "unreliable" calculations by the Department of Energy and Climate Change have led it to underestimate the charges.

The NERA economists will also conclude that the ECO system is an �expensive� way of helping poorer households bring down their energy bills.

Last night, a spokesman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change said: �ECO replaces existing energy efficiency schemes almost pound for pound, so there will be no additional costs on bills.

�New powers under the Energy Act 2011 will allow us to require energy companies to provide regular information on the actual costs of delivery and how these are passed through to consumers. For the first time we will know if energy companies are simply passing through actual costs or looking to increase their profits by charging consumers more than is necessary.

"We will keep the impact on consumer bills under constant review throughout the lifetime of the scheme.�

The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has found that the rising gas price is the biggest cause of higher bills for energy customers, adding around �290 to the average annual bill between 2004 and 2010.

Green charges have contributed around �75, including �30 to support investment in low-carbon power generation, and �45 for funding energy efficiency improvements in homes.

However, the effect of environmental policies on bills is likely to get bigger over the next decade as bill-payers will have to partially subsidise new wind farms and nuclear power stations. The CCC believes environmental policies will raise bills by around �110 a year by 2020.

Ed Davey, the Energy Secretary, says this will be cheaper for households in the long run as too much reliance on gas power stations will leave the UK exposed to the rising price of fossil fuels.

He told MPs on the Energy Committee this week that most experts believe gas prices will "stay high or go higher".


As everyone knows this is the biggest rip off known to man, energy companies produce energy, sell it back to themselves, increase the price and then YOU muggins have to buy it.
Oil is around $107 dollars a barrel down from the $145 it was, has there been a drop in prices, NO because they are ripping you off.
As for Camerloon saying he will get the companies to give you the lowest tariff, bull---t, he cannot make them do anything as they as mostly owned by foreigners.
Wake up and smell the rip-off, this is the highest taxed country in the world and they still cannot make ends meet, WHY, because we are giving it away to the EU, foreigners who are living here and foreigner abroad, WE ARE THE STUPIDIST PEOPLE EVER TO HAVE INHABITED THE EARTH.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Imperial Party forum Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com


For Support - http://forums.BizHat.com

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | FlashWebHost.com | Image Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBBweb.com, setup your forum now!