Important Notice:
We regret to inform you that our free phpBB forum hosting service will be discontinued by the end of June 30, 2024.
If you wish to migrate to our paid hosting service, please contact [email protected].
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thomas davison Party Leader
Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 4018 Location: northumberland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:49 am Post subject: TAX PAYERS ARE FUNDING UNIONS TO THE TUNE OF 113 MILLION PA |
|
|
Taxpayers 'Funding Trade Unions By �113m Per Year', Say Taxpayers' Alliance
First Posted: 25/11/11 09:47 GMT Updated: 25/11/11 10:20 GMT
Taxpayers are funding trade unions to the tune of �113 million a year through direct grants and paid time off for union reps in public-sector organisations, according to new research published.
Under legislation dating back to 1975, union representatives are allowed paid time off for duties such as negotiating terms and conditions, helping union members with disciplinary procedures and discussing issues such as redundancies.
Figures obtained by the TaxPayers' Alliance (TPA) pressure group from public-sector employers around the country found that paid time off amounted to the equivalent of 2,840 full-time staff in 2010/11. The TPA estimated the cost to taxpayers of this time off at �80 million, or 0.14%, of the annual public-sector pay bill.
If public-sector organisations cut it to the 0.04% seen in the private sector, it would be the equivalent of making an additional 2,028 full-time workers available for front-line posts, said the group.
Additionally, public-sector organisations paid almost �33 million directly to trade unions in 2010/11 - the bulk of it made up of the Department for Business's �21.4 million support for the TUC's Union Learning Fund, which provides skills training.
TPA director Matthew Sinclair said: "Taxpayers shouldn't be funding staff to work for trade unions, providing them with a huge activist base to support strikes and freeing up resources for political campaigns.
"Paying for the salaries of full-time union staff and the many grants the unions receive is yet another burden on hard-pressed families, diverting money they expect to be spent on frontline services. The Government need to take action and end this scandalous subsidy for unions disrupting services in a vain attempt to stop necessary restraint in public spending."
Public-sector union Unison cited research commissioned by the Department for Business suggesting that union representation saves the public purse between �170 million and �400 million a year by improving retention, training take-up, health and safety and dispute resolution.
The public sector needs to be vastly trimmed back, too many people thinking they are our masters and are entitled to higher pay and gold plated pensions for doing nothing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|